|
|
Rahm Emanual, Obama and H.R.3604
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 05:48:39 +0100 (CET)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann"
To: stewwebb@sierranv.net, stefangrossmann@t-online.de,
too@slingshot.co.nz, timrifat@rvscience.com,
wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com, palast@gregpalast.com,
tom2@tomflocco.com, skolnick@ameritech.net, henry@savethemales.ca,
leurenmoret@yahoo.com, prophecy@texemarrs.com,
smith@iamthewitness.com, eric@iamthewitness.com,
captainmay@prodigy.net, tarpley@tarpley.net,
takingaim@pacbell.net, webmaster@rense.com,
articles@davidicke.com, chamish@netvision.net.il,
michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com, crescentandcross@gmail.com,
tips@infowars.com, cloak.dagger@gmail.com, lennybloom@gmail.com,
eric@vaticanassassins.org, email@spirituallysmart.com,
deadlinelive@yahoo.com, vyzygoth@hotmail.com,
alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com, Tillawi@currentissues.tv,
prothink@yahoo.com
Subject: Rahm Emanual, Obama and H.R.3604
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="673810-1036121257-1225946919=:18818"
Status: RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
--673810-1036121257-1225946919=:18818
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Hi,
This summer H.R.6304 was passed through congress, where the
voting behavior of our fresh U.S. President elect was rather
peculiar. See the four emails below for that.
In the third email (H.R.6304-3) below someone on the Camel's Nose Blog
even made the prediction that Rahm Emamuel would become the new Attorney
General after Obama voted in favor for H.R.6304, after in turn Emanuel
had endorsed Obama. Well that didn't happen but Rahm Emanuel [6] did
become Chief of Staff for the U.S. President.
Knowing what the implications are for H.R.6304, one should keep
a very close eye on who becomes the new Attorney General. If
Michael Bernard Mukasey stays on as U.S. Attorney General, then
U.S. Citizins should be prepared for the worst of what might come.
If its to be Rahm Emamuel and Michael Mukasey like above, its
going to be a pigs game where Obama will know nothing about. People
might disappear into death camps without no-one even knowing.
Regards,
Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
==H.R.6304-4
==Re: There Is No Fourth Amendment======================
From stock@stokkie.net Sat Jul 12 10:42:07 2008 +0200
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:42:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann"
To: stewwebb@sierranv.net, stefangrossmann@t-online.de,
too@slingshot.co.nz, wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com,
palast@gregpalast.com, tom@tomflocco.com, skolnick@ameritech.net,
henry@savethemales.ca, leurenmoret@yahoo.com,
prophecy@texemarrs.com, smith@iamthewitness.com,
eric@iamthewitness.com, captainmay@prodigy.net,
tarpley@tarpley.net, takingaim@pacbell.net, webmaster@rense.com,
articles@davidicke.com, chamish@netvision.net.il,
michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com, crescentandcross@gmail.com,
tips@infowars.com, cloak.dagger@gmail.com, lennybloom@gmail.com,
eric@vaticanassassins.org, email@spirituallysmart.com,
deadlinelive@yahoo.com, vyzygoth@hotmail.com,
alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com, Tillawi@currentissues.tv,
prothink@yahoo.com, lee@roguegovernment.com
Subject: Re: There Is No Fourth Amendment
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Status: RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
Hi,
I had phoned in on Stadmillers Intel Report on July 8th, warning about
the H.R. 6304 bill which was going to be sneaked through the Senate,
after Daniel Ellsberg had been interviewed by Tim Ferriss over the
Weekend [1]. But somehow John Stadmiller thought it was not that
critical as it was just a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
Amendment. Oh they are doing a physical searches? What are they gonna
seize then? Your telephone or your computer? That wasn't clear to me
either. But what this Bill sneakes through is the anihilation of the
4th Amendment [2] :
"Skull and Bones member, war criminal and traitor George W. Bush
recently signed HR 6304 or the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 into law
that effectively makes the Fourth Amendment null and void. The new
law disregards the protections guaranteed in the Fourth Amendment
and allows the government to spy on people without a warrant so
long as the government reasonably believes that they are gathering
information on somebody from a foreign country. The government can
reasonably believe whatever they want and not have to provide
probable cause supported by an oath or affirmation to obtain a
warrant before they engage in spying activities. It gives them a
blank check to spy on whoever they please. It also eliminates any
sort of oversight in the intelligence gathering process, and this
is a dangerous proposition. The law also gives immunity to
telecommunication companies from lawsuits pertaining to their prior
cooperation in the unlawful spying programs implemented by the
government. As expected, Bush and the supporters of this newly
passed law are using the bogus excuse of the war on terror to
undermine civil liberties. The terror war as has been documented
time and time again is a fraud designed to setup a police state,
justify illegal foreign wars and destroy the rule of law. The only
reason there has been such a hurry to get this legislation passed
into law is so Bush's buddies in these Fortune 100 companies won't
get sued over their felonious activity.
The ACLU is already planning to challenge the legality of this new
law. Here's what the lead attorney from the ACLU had to say about
this new law.
'The law lets government "conduct intrusive surveillance without
ever telling a court who it intends to surveil, what phone lines
and e-mail addresses it intends to monitor, where its
surveillance targets are located, or why it's conducting the
surveillance," said ACLU national security director Jameel
Jaffer, the lead attorney in the suit.'
Let's take a look at the text of the Fourth Amendment.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon
probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to
be seized.
The Fourth Amendment requires that a warrant be issued only upon
probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation. This law gives
the federal government power to conduct surveillance without a
warrant which means that it is unconstitutional and should be
immediately thrown out by the judiciary. Amazingly the law itself
references the Fourth Amendment several times even though it
contains language that directly contradicts it. It essentially says
that the government can spy on people without a warrant so long as
it is reasonably believed you aren't spying on an American citizen.
It also states that this sort of spying activity should be
conducted in a manner consistent with the Fourth Amendment. This is
ridiculous as the government cannot conduct the type of spying that
is authorized in this law while conducting it in a manner
consistent with the Fourth Amendment. It is a total contradiction."
And that's not the entire story, as H.R. 6304 also removes our
Elected President from any possible oversight into Whom /Why /and What
is getting targeted by the new FISA act of 2008 :
6304 is a Jewish Powergrab
==========================
Not only is H.R. 6304 the enactment of Worldwide STASI Surveillance ,
but more important, H.R. 6304 is a Jewish power-grab over the FISA
Act of 1978. It turns out that the U.S. President's authority and
signature is now completely bypassed if H.R. 6304 gets passed.
In fact H.R. 6304 is a Power Grab over FISA by United States Attorney
General Michael Bernard Mukasey himself.
Mukasey is the second Jewish U.S. Attorney General, after Edward H.
Levi, who was the 71st United States Attorney General from 1975 to
1977. It was during Edward H. Levi's reign as US Attorney General that
the footwork for the "FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT" of 1978
was finalized.
What is going on here? The Amendments made in H.R. 6304 all skip and
strike out the paragraphs who give final authority to the U.S.
President. The new final authority will be the U.S. Attorney General
throughout the entire proposed FISA act. Here's an example on page 73
in the pdf :
"SEC. 107. AMENDMENTS FOR PHYSICAL SEARCHES.
(a) APPLICATIONS.Section 303 of the Foreign In-
telligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1823) is
amended --
(1) in subsection (a)
(A) by striking paragraph (2);"
From the original FISA act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1823) we read :
§ 1823. Application for order
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sec_50_00001823----000-.html
"(2) the authority conferred on the Attorney General by the
President and the approval of the Attorney General to make the
application;"
So the President's signature is safely and convenient skipped to get an
Order issued. Hence the Attorney General (Mukasey) will basicly be
working entirely independent from all possible oversight.... if H.R.
6304 gets passed.
Besides the warning of Sen. Chris Dodd [3], who said that granting
retroactive immunity would undermine the rule of law, The U.S.
Presidents authority will be undermined as well. Basicly the new
President Elect in 2009 will be a lame duck when it concerns FISA.
Lee Rogers continues [2]:
"Even though the ACLU is far from a perfect group, they do have the
Constitution on their side. This new law is entirely
unconstitutional and it should be thrown out. Hopefully the ACLU
will succeed in accomplishing this. One thing is for sure, Bush and
the gaggle of traitors in Congress that supported the passage of
this bill into law should be thrown out of office immediately. If
the war on terror is real, how come the nation's borders are wide
open and Bush does nothing about the terrorist attacks currently
taking place on the U.S.-Mexico border? Why does the Bush
administration need to spy on people without a warrant, when they
are not concerned with dangerous activity taking place in our own
backyard? It is entirely hypocritical for Bush to use the phony
terror war to justify the passage of this unlawful legislation. If
he really wanted to stop terrorism a good first step would be for
him to order the CIA otherwise known as the Cocaine Importing
Agency to stop staging terrorist attacks. This new law is a bunch
of garbage. It does not help fight terrorism and it does not
protect civil liberties as Bush claims. Quite frankly, this new law
sucks."
Traitors in the US Congress huh? Someone wrote a followup on my
"Conspiracy Theory" at the Camel's Nose blog [4] :
"Egad! The Stasi AND the Jews?"
Nijma Says:
July 8, 2008 at 12:08 am
Egad! The Stasi AND the Jews?
Take a look at this time line on Daily KOS [5] and you will see that
Obama changed his vote on FISA right after getting an endorsement
from Rahm Emmanuel. If your conspiracy theory is correct, and Im
not ruling out ANY conspiracy theories at this point, then U.S.
Representative and Superdelgate from Illinois Rahm Emmanuel has an
understanding with Obama to be the next Attorney General.
Come back to this comment after January 20, 2009, and see if it was
a prophecy."
Well i sure hope for the future that the show hosts at RBN identify
real threats when someone calls in and warns about them. Turns out that
more people had called in that day trying to warn about H.R. 6304.
Best Regards,
Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
[1] "What Every American Needs to Know (and Do) About FISA Before Tuesday"
* Tim Ferriss interviews Daniel Ellsberg about H.R. 6304, June 7th, 2008,
interview held Sunday evening, July 6, 2008
http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/
http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/?s=Daniel+Ellsberg&x=22&y=11
[2] "There Is No Fourth Amendment"
by Lee Rogers, 07-11-2008
http://www.roguegovernment.com
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=10609
[3] FISA Amendments Act of 2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FISA_Amendments_Act_of_2008
[4] "Egad! The Stasi AND the Jews?"
by Nijma,
July 8, 2008 at 12:08 am
http://camelsnose.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/senator ...
[5] "Obama's FISA reversal and the FISA timeline"
by wigwam
Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 10:11:57 AM PDT
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/7/115227/7027/466/547691
[6] "Journalist Reaches From Grave To Nail Rahm"
"Excerpts From Archived News Investigations"
by The Late Sherman H. Skolnick (July 13 1930 May 21, 2006) 11-9-8
http://www.rense.com/general84/nodm.htm
==H.R.6304-3
==Obama supports H.R. 6304 after Rahm Emmanuel endorses Obama==
From stock@stokkie.net Tue Jul 8 18:47:44 2008 +0200
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:47:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann"
To: stewwebb@sierranv.net, stefangrossmann@t-online.de,
too@slingshot.co.nz, wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com,
palast@gregpalast.com, tom@tomflocco.com, skolnick@ameritech.net,
henry@savethemales.ca, leurenmoret@yahoo.com,
prophecy@texemarrs.com, smith@iamthewitness.com,
eric@iamthewitness.com, captainmay@prodigy.net,
tarpley@tarpley.net, takingaim@pacbell.net, webmaster@rense.com,
articles@davidicke.com, chamish@netvision.net.il,
michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com, crescentandcross@gmail.com,
tips@infowars.com, cloak.dagger@gmail.com, lennybloom@gmail.com,
eric@vaticanassassins.org, email@spirituallysmart.com,
deadlinelive@yahoo.com, vyzygoth@hotmail.com,
alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com, Tillawi@currentissues.tv,
prothink@yahoo.com
Subject: Obama supports H.R. 6304 after Rahm Emmanuel endorses Obama
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Status: RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
Hi,
From the Camel's Nose blog :
http://camelsnose.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/senator ...
"Egad! The Stasi AND the Jews?"
Nijma Says:
July 8, 2008 at 12:08 am
Egad! The Stasi AND the Jews?
Take a look at this time line on Daily KOS [1] and you will see that
Obama changed his vote on FISA right after getting an endorsement
from Rahm Emmanuel. If your conspiracy theory is correct, and Im
not ruling out ANY conspiracy theories at this point, then U.S.
Representative and Superdelgate from Illinois Rahm Emmanuel has an
understanding with Obama to be the next Attorney General.
Come back to this comment after January 20, 2009, and see if it was
a prophecy."
Well this is enough evidence to be very worried.
Cheers,
Robert
PS.
[1] "Obama's FISA reversal and the FISA timeline"
by wigwam
Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 10:11:57 AM PDT
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/7/115227/7027/466/547691
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Robert M. Stockmann wrote:
> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:41:52 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Robert M. Stockmann
> To: stewwebb@sierranv.net, stefangrossmann@t-online.de, too@slingshot.co.nz,
> wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com, palast@gregpalast.com,
> tom@tomflocco.com, skolnick@ameritech.net, henry@savethemales.ca,
> leurenmoret@yahoo.com, prophecy@texemarrs.com, smith@iamthewitness.com,
> eric@iamthewitness.com, captainmay@prodigy.net, tarpley@tarpley.net,
> takingaim@pacbell.net, webmaster@rense.com, articles@davidicke.com,
> chamish@netvision.net.il, michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com,
> crescentandcross@gmail.com, tips@infowars.com, cloak.dagger@gmail.com,
> lennybloom@gmail.com, eric@vaticanassassins.org,
> email@spirituallysmart.com, deadlinelive@yahoo.com, vyzygoth@hotmail.com,
> alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com, Tillawi@currentissues.tv,
> prothink@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: H.R. 6304 is a Jewish Powergrab
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Not only is H.R. 6304 the enactment of Worldwide STASI Surveillance ,
> but more important, H.R. 6304 is a Jewish power-grab over the FISA
> Act of 1978. It turns out that the U.S. President's authority and
> signature is now completely bypassed if H.R. 6304 gets passed.
>
> In fact H.R. 6304 is a Power Grab over FISA by United States Attorney
> General Michael Bernard Mukasey himself.
>
> Mukasey is the second Jewish U.S. Attorney General, after Edward H.
> Levi, who was the 71st United States Attorney General from 1975 to
> 1977. It was during Edward H. Levi's reign as US Attorney General that
> the footwork for the "FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT" of 1978
> was finalized.
>
> What is going on here? The Amendments made in H.R. 6304 all skip and
> strike out the paragraphs who give final authority to the U.S.
> President. The new final authority will be the U.S. Attorney General
> throughout the entire proposed FISA act. Here's an example on page 73
> in the pdf :
>
> "SEC. 107. AMENDMENTS FOR PHYSICAL SEARCHES.
> (a) APPLICATIONS.Section 303 of the Foreign In-
> telligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1823) is
> amended --
> (1) in subsection (a)
> (A) by striking paragraph (2);"
>
> From the original FISA act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1823) we read :
>
> § 1823. Application for order
> http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sec_50_00001823----000-.html
>
> "(2) the authority conferred on the Attorney General by the
> President and the approval of the Attorney General to make the
> application;"
>
> So the President's signature is safely and convenient skipped to get an
> Order issued. Hence the Attorney General (Mukasey) will basicly be
> working entirely independent from all possible oversight.... if H.R.
> 6304 gets passed.
>
> Besides the warning of Sen. Chris Dodd [1], who said that granting
> retroactive immunity would undermine the rule of law, The U.S.
> Presidents authority will be undermined as well. Basicly the new
> President Elect in 2009 will be a lame duck when it concerns FISA.
>
> > This one needs to be stopped. See also :
> >
> > "What Every American Needs to Know (and Do) About FISA
> > Before Tuesday"
> > * Tim Ferriss interviews Daniel Ellsberg about H.R. 6304
> > http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/
> >
> > "ALL AMERICANS: Go to the EFF website here and put in your zipcode to
> > find your Senators phone number. Call them and read the short script
> > on the same page. If no answer, click the link at the bottom of the
> > page to e-mail them."
> > https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?alertId=389&pg=makeACall
> >
> > "Senator Obama - Please Vote NO on Telecom Immunity - Get FISA Right"
> > http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/SenatorObama-PleaseVoteAgainstFISA
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Robert
> >
>
> [1] FISA Amendments Act of 2008
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FISA_Amendments_Act_of_2008
>
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
==H.R.6304-2
==Re: H.R. 6304 is a Jewish Powergrab=====================
From stock@stokkie.net Tue Jul 8 01:41:52 2008 +0200
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:41:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann"
To: stewwebb@sierranv.net, stefangrossmann@t-online.de>,
too@slingshot.co.nz, wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com,
palast@gregpalast.com, tom@tomflocco.com, skolnick@ameritech.net,
henry@savethemales.ca, leurenmoret@yahoo.com,
prophecy@texemarrs.com, smith@iamthewitness.com,
eric@iamthewitness.com, captainmay@prodigy.net,
tarpley@tarpley.net, takingaim@pacbell.net, webmaster@rense.com,
articles@davidicke.com, chamish@netvision.net.il,
michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com, crescentandcross@gmail.com,
tips@infowars.com, cloak.dagger@gmail.com, lennybloom@gmail.com,
eric@vaticanassassins.org, email@spirituallysmart.com,
deadlinelive@yahoo.com, vyzygoth@hotmail.com,
alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com, Tillawi@currentissues.tv,
prothink@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: H.R. 6304 is a Jewish Powergrab
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Status: RO
X-Status: A
X-Keywords:
Hi,
Not only is H.R. 6304 the enactment of Worldwide STASI Surveillance ,
but more important, H.R. 6304 is a Jewish power-grab over the FISA
Act of 1978. It turns out that the U.S. President's authority and
signature is now completely bypassed if H.R. 6304 gets passed.
In fact H.R. 6304 is a Power Grab over FISA by United States Attorney
General Michael Bernard Mukasey himself.
Mukasey is the second Jewish U.S. Attorney General, after Edward H.
Levi, who was the 71st United States Attorney General from 1975 to
1977. It was during Edward H. Levi's reign as US Attorney General that
the footwork for the "FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT" of 1978
was finalized.
What is going on here? The Amendments made in H.R. 6304 all skip and
strike out the paragraphs who give final authority to the U.S.
President. The new final authority will be the U.S. Attorney General
throughout the entire proposed FISA act. Here's an example on page 73
in the pdf :
"SEC. 107. AMENDMENTS FOR PHYSICAL SEARCHES.
(a) APPLICATIONS.Section 303 of the Foreign In-
telligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1823) is
amended --
(1) in subsection (a)
(A) by striking paragraph (2);"
From the original FISA act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1823) we read :
§ 1823. Application for order
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sec_50_00001823----000-.html
"(2) the authority conferred on the Attorney General by the
President and the approval of the Attorney General to make the
application;"
So the President's signature is safely and convenient skipped to get an
Order issued. Hence the Attorney General (Mukasey) will basicly be
working entirely independent from all possible oversight.... if H.R.
6304 gets passed.
Besides the warning of Sen. Chris Dodd [1], who said that granting
retroactive immunity would undermine the rule of law, The U.S.
Presidents authority will be undermined as well. Basicly the new
President Elect in 2009 will be a lame duck when it concerns FISA.
> This one needs to be stopped. See also :
>
> "What Every American Needs to Know (and Do) About FISA
> Before Tuesday"
> * Tim Ferriss interviews Daniel Ellsberg about H.R. 6304
> http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/
>
> "ALL AMERICANS: Go to the EFF website here and put in your zipcode to
> find your Senators phone number. Call them and read the short script
> on the same page. If no answer, click the link at the bottom of the
> page to e-mail them."
> https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?alertId=389&pg=makeACall
>
> "Senator Obama - Please Vote NO on Telecom Immunity - Get FISA Right"
> http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/SenatorObama-PleaseVoteAgainstFISA
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>
[1] FISA Amendments Act of 2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FISA_Amendments_Act_of_2008
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
==H.R.6304-1
==H.R.6304 : WorldWide STASI Surveillance================
From stock@stokkie.net Mon Jul 7 21:29:46 2008 +0200
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:29:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann"
To: stewwebb@sierranv.net, stefangrossmann@t-online.de>,
too@slingshot.co.nz>, wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com>,
palast@gregpalast.com>, tom@tomflocco.com, skolnick@ameritech.net,
henry@savethemales.ca>, leurenmoret@yahoo.com,
prophecy@texemarrs.com>, smith@iamthewitness.com,
eric@iamthewitness.com>, captainmay@prodigy.net,
tarpley@tarpley.net>, takingaim@pacbell.net, webmaster@rense.com,
articles@davidicke.com, chamish@netvision.net.il,
michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com, crescentandcross@gmail.com,
tips@infowars.com, cloak.dagger@gmail.com, lennybloom@gmail.com,
eric@vaticanassassins.org, email@spirituallysmart.com,
deadlinelive@yahoo.com, vyzygoth@hotmail.com,
alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com, Tillawi@currentissues.tv,
prothink@yahoo.com
Subject: H.R. 6304 : WorldWide STASI Surveillance
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Status: RO
X-Status: A
X-Keywords:
Dear Fellow World Citizins,
The following bill is supposed to get passed through the Senate
on Tuesday July 8, 2008 :
"HR6304, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008"
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.06304:
This act will give unlimited Global STASI Powers to the U.S. President.
Even Barack Obama seems to have re-aligned himself to support this
bill and vote it through the Senate... So what is this Bill about ?
With H.R.6304, STASI House Searches now also comes Overseas! :
"SEC. 702. PROCEDURES FOR TARGETING CERTAIN PER-
SONS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES OTHER
THAN UNITED STATES PERSONS.
(a) AUTHORIZATION. -- Not withstanding any other
provision of law, upon the issuance of an order in accord-
ance with subsection (i)(3) or a determination under sub-
section (c)(2), the Attorney General and the Director of
National Intelligence may authorize jointly, for a period
of up to 1 year from the effective date of the authoriza-
tion, the targeting of persons reasonably believed to be lo-
cated outside the United States to acquire foreign intel-
ligence information. "
And they come unwarrented and if you survive, you might get harmed. But
you CANNOT sue them as SEC. 107 has been revised. In short it means "If
they violate your body through search, and they find nothing, YOU
CANNOT SUE THEM in court"
"SEC. 107. AMENDMENTS FOR PHYSICAL SEARCHES.
"(5) In the event that such application for approval
is denied, or in any other case where the physical search
77
is terminated and no order is issued approving the phys-
ical search, no information obtained or evidence derived
from such physical search shall be received in evidence or
otherwise disclosed in any trial, hearing, or other pro-
ceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department,
office, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or
other authority of the United States, a State, or political
subdivision thereof, and no information concerning any
United States person acquired from such physical search
shall subsequently be used or disclosed in any other man-
ner by Federal officers or employees without the consent
of such person, except with the approval of the Attorney
General if the information indicates a threat of death or
serious bodily harm to any person.
"(6) The Attorney General shall assess compliance
with the requirements of paragraph (5).".
This one needs to be stopped. See also :
"What Every American Needs to Know (and Do) About FISA
Before Tuesday"
* Tim Ferriss interviews Daniel Ellsberg about H.R. 6304
http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/
"ALL AMERICANS: Go to the EFF website here and put in your zipcode to
find your Senators phone number. Call them and read the short script
on the same page. If no answer, click the link at the bottom of the
page to e-mail them."
https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?alertId=389&pg=makeACall
"Senator Obama - Please Vote NO on Telecom Immunity - Get FISA Right"
http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/SenatorObama-PleaseVoteAgainstFISA
Regards,
Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
--673810-1036121257-1225946919=:18818
Content-Type: APPLICATION/pdf; name="HR6304pcs.txt.pdf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-ID:
Content-Description:
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="HR6304pcs.txt.pdf"
--673810-1036121257-1225946919=:18818--
HAMDAN v. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.
No. 05184. Argued March 28, 2006 Decided June 29, 2006
( A good tip when reading legal proceedings is to install and use
gnome-dictionary, which is a part of the gnome-utils-2.6.2-4mdk on
Mandrake/Mandriva desktops. If you don't know which package it is
just try to start /usr/bin/gnome-dictionary. )
From stock@stokkie.net Sun Jul 2 15:25:16 2006 +0200
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:25:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann"
To: letters@washpost.com, letters@nytimes.com, letters@latimes.com,
editor@usatoday.com, info@miamitimesonline.com,
news@miamitimesonline.com, HeraldEd@herald.com,
journal@c-span.org
Subject: Re: Top Ten Things You Can Say About Hamdan Case
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0607021521060.6605-100000@hubble.stokkie.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Dear Editors,
After reading "bench conference" by Andrew Cohen, "Top Ten Things
You Can Say About Hamdan Case", top_ten_things_to_remember_abo.html
I was surprised how such a important ruling was being put away
with "It's the worst decision ever." I however conclude the opposite.
The case of Hamdan vs Rumsfeld has been heating up on the judicial
stove since Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni national, has been in custody
since June 2002 at an American prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The bad
thing for Rummy and his crownies is that the coffee inside that kettle
today has become undrinkable. As we have seen before with the
Downingstreet Memo's where :
"the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."
We today can observe that The Government's and Congress' conduct of
legislative proposals have been fixed around this very particular law
case, the case of Hamdan vs Rumsfeld [1]. This sounds unbelievable but
its the undeniable truth. Last week the supreme court has come to the
exact same conclusion. What had happened?
Mister Hamdam had been Osama bin Ladens "bodyguard and personal
driver", and had been accused of undisclosed charges, even mentioning
the word conspiracy. On Nov 8, 2004, after Hamdam had filed multiple
petitions for writs of habeas corpus, The District Court of Columbia
finally granted Hamdans request.
Habeas corpus :
L. you may have the body. (Law)
A writ having for its object to bring a party before a court
or judge; especially, one to inquire into the cause of a
person's imprisonment or detention by another, with the view
to protect the right to personal liberty; also, one to bring
a prisoner into court to testify in a pending trial.
--Bouvier.
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit however
reversed that request in 2005. It was about the same time when the
Government passed the so-called Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA).
A very controversial piece of legislative text, as we will find out.
On November 7, 2005, The Supreme Court however granted certiorari in
the Hamdam case.
Note: A certiorari is the correct process to remove the
proceedings of a court in which cases are tried in a
manner different from the course of the common law, as
of county commissioners. It is also used as an
auxiliary process in order to obtain a full return to
some other process. --Bouvier.
From here on the SUPREME COURT Ruling reads as follows :
Page 15 - 22 inside [1]:
"On February 13, 2006, the Government filed a motion to dismiss the
writ of certiorari. The ground cited for dismissal was the recently
enacted Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA), Pub. L. 109148, 119
Stat. 2739. We postponed our ruling on that motion pending argument
on the merits, 546 U. S. ___ (2006), and now deny it.
The DTA, which was signed into law on December 30, 2005, addresses
a broad swath of subjects related to detainees. It places
restrictions on the treatment and interrogation of detainees in
U.S. custody, and it furnishes procedural protections for U.S.
personnel accused of engaging in improper interrogation. DTA
§§10021004, 119 Stat. 27392740.
It also sets forth certain "PROCEDURES FOR STATUS REVIEW OF
DETAINEES OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES." §1005, id., at 2740.
Subsections (a) through (d) of §1005 direct the Secretary of
Defense to report to Congress the procedures being used by CSRTs to
determine the proper classification of detainees held in Guantanamo
Bay, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and to adopt certain safeguards as part
of those procedures.
(CSRT : Combatant Status Review Tribunal)
Subsection (e) of §1005, which is entitled "JUDICIAL REVIEW OF
DETENTION OF ENEMY COMBATANTS," supplies the basis for the
Government's jurisdictional argument. The subsection contains
three numbered paragraphs. The first paragraph amends the judicial
code as follows:
"(1) IN GENERAL.--Section 2241 of title 28, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
. . . . .
"(e) Except as provided in section 1005 of the Detainee Treatment
Act of 2005, no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to
hear or consider
"(1) an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by or on
behalf of an alien detained by the Department of Defense at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; or
"(2) any other action against the United States or its agents
relating to any aspect of the detention by the Department of
Defense of an alien at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who--
"'(A) is currently in military custody; or
"'(B) has been determined by the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit in accordance with the procedures
set forth in section 1005(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005
to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant.'"
§1005(e), id., at 27412742.
Paragraph (2) of subsection (e) vests in the Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit the "exclusive jurisdiction to
determine the validity of any final decision of a [CSRT] that an
alien is properly designated as an enemy combatant."
Paragraph (2) also delimits the scope of that review. See
§§1005(e)(2)(C)(i)(ii), id., at 2742.
Paragraph (3) mirrors paragraph (2) in structure, but governs
judicial review of final decisions of military commissions, not
CSRTs. It vests in the Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit "exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity
of any final decision rendered pursuant to Military Commission
Order No. 1, dated August 31, 2005 (or any successor military
order)." §1005(e)(3)(A), id., at 2743.2
Review is as of right for any alien sentenced to death or a term of
imprisonment of 10 years or more, but is at the Court of Appeals'
discretion in all other cases. The scope of review is limited to
the following inquiries:
"(i) whether the final decision [of the military commission] was
consistent with the standards and procedures specified in the
military order referred to in subparagraph (A); and
"(ii) to the extent the Constitution and laws of the United States
are applicable, whether the use of such standards and procedures to
reach the final decision is consistent with the Constitution and
laws of the United States." §1005(e)(3)(D), ibid.
Finally, §1005 contains an "effective date" provision, which reads
as follows:
"(1) IN GENERAL.--This section shall take effect on the date
of the enactment of this Act.
"(2) REVIEW OF COMBATANT STATUS TRIBUNAL AND MILITARY
COMMISSION DECISIONS.--Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (e) shall
apply with respect to any claim whose review is governed by one of
such paragraphs and that is pending on or after the date of the
enactment of this Act." §1005(h), id., at 2743 2744.3
The Act is silent about whether paragraph (1) of subsection (e)
"shall apply" to claims pending on the date of enactment.
The Government argues that §§1005(e)(1) and 1005(h) had the
immediate effect, upon enactment, of repealing federal jurisdiction
not just over detainee habeas actions yet to be filed but also over
any such actions then pending in any federal courtincluding this
Court. Accordingly, it argues, we lack jurisdiction to review the
Court of Appeals' decision below.
Hamdan objects to this theory on both constitutional and statutory
grounds. Principal among his constitutional arguments is that the
Government's preferred reading raises grave questions about
Congress' authority to impinge upon this Courtes appellate
jurisdiction, particularly in habeas cases. Support for this
argument is drawn from Ex parte Yerger, 8 Wall. 85 (1869), in
which, having explained that "the denial to this court of appellate
jurisdiction" to consider an original writ of habeas corpus would
"greatly weaken the efficacy of the writ," id., at 102103, we held
that Congress would not be presumed to have effected such denial
absent an unmistakably clear statement to the contrary. See id., at
104105; see also Felker v. Turpin, 518 U. S. 651 (1996); Durousseau
v. United States, 6 Cranch 307, 314 (1810) (opinion for the Court
by Marshall, C. J.)
(The "appellate powers of this court" are
not created by statute but are "given by the constitution");
United States v. Klein, 13 Wall. 128 (1872). Cf. Ex parte McCardle,
7 Wall. 506, 514 (1869) (holding that Congress had validly
foreclosed one avenue of appellate review where its repeal of
habeas jurisdiction, reproduced in the margin,4 could not have been
"a plainer instance of positive exception").
Hamdan also suggests that, if the Governments reading is correct,
Congress has unconstitutionally suspended the writ of habeas corpus.
We find it unnecessary to reach either of these arguments.
Ordinary principles of statutory construction suffice to rebut the
Government's theory --at least in sofar as this case, which was
pending at the time the DTA was enacted, is concerned.
The Government acknowledges that only paragraphs (2) and (3) of
subsection (e) are expressly made applicable to pending cases, see
§1005(h)(2), 119 Stat. 27432744, but argues that the omission of
paragraph (1) from the scope of that express statement is of no
moment. This is so, we are told, because Congress' failure to
expressly reserve federal courts' jurisdiction over pending cases
erects a presumption against jurisdiction, and that presumption is
rebutted by neither the text nor the legislative history of the DTA.
The first part of this argument is not entirely without support in
our precedents. We have in the past "applied intervening statutes
conferring or ousting jurisdiction, whether or not jurisdiction lay
when the underlying conduct occurred or when the suit was filed."
Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U. S. 244, 274 (1994) (citing
Bruner v. United States, 343 U. S. 112 (1952); Hallowell v.
Commons, 239 U. S. 506 (1916)); see Republic of Austria v.
Altmann, 541 U. S. 677, 693 (2004).
But the "presumption" that these cases have applied is more
accurately viewed as the nonapplication of another presumption--
viz., the presumption against retroactivity--in certain limited
circumstances.5 If a statutory provision "would operate
retroactively" as applied to cases pending at the time the
provision was enacted, then "our traditional presumption teaches
that it does not govern absent clear congressional intent favoring
such a result." Landgraf, 511 U. S., at 280.
We have explained, however, that, unlike other intervening changes
in the law, a jurisdiction-conferring or jurisdiction-stripping
statute usually "takes away no substantive right but simply changes
the tribunal that is to hear the case." Hallowell, 239 U. S., at
508.
If that is truly all the statute does, no retroactivity problem
arises because the change in the law does not "impair rights a
party possessed when he acted, increase a party's liability for past
conduct, or impose new duties with respect to transactions already
completed." Landgraf, 511 U. S., at 280.6 And if a new rule has no
retroactive effect, the presumption against retroactivity will not
prevent its application to a case that was already pending when the
new rule was enacted.
That does not mean, however, that all jurisdiction-stripping
provisions--or even all such provisions that truly lack retroactive
effect--must apply to cases pending at the time of their enactment.
enactment.7 "[N]ormal rules of construction," including a
contextual reading of the statutory language, may dictate
otherwise. Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U. S. 320, 326 (1997).8
A familiar principle of statutory construction, relevant both in
Lindh and here, is that a negative inference may be drawn from the
exclusion of language from one statutory provision that is included
in other provisions of the same statute. See id., at 330; see also,
e.g., Russello v. United States, 464 U. S. 16, 23 (1983) ("[W]here
Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute
but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally
presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the
disparate inclusion or exclusiona"). The Court in Lindh relied on
this reasoning to conclude that certain limitations on the
availability of habeas relief imposed by AEDPA applied only to
(AEDPA : the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
cases filed after that statute's effective date. Congress' failure
to identify the temporal reach of those limitations, which governed
noncapital cases, stood in contrast to its express command in the
same legislation that new rules governing habeas petitions in
capital cases "apply to cases pending on or after the date of
enactment." §107(c), 110 Stat. 1226; see Lindh, 521 U. S., at
329330. That contrast, combined with the fact that the amendments
at issue "affect[ed] substantive entitlement to relief," id., at
327, warranted drawing a negative inference.
A like inference follows a fortiori from Lindh in this case. "If .
. . Congress was reasonably concerned to ensure that [§§1005(e)(2)
and (3)] be applied to pending cases, it should have been just as
concerned about [§1005(e)(1)], unless it had the different intent
that the latter [section] not be applied to the general run of
pending cases." Id., at 329. If anything, the evidence of
deliberate omission is stronger here than it was in Lindh. In
Lindh, the provisions to be contrasted had been drafted separately
but were later "joined together and . . . considered simultaneously
when the language raising the implication was inserted." Id., at
330. We observed that Congress' tandem review and approval of the
two sets of provisions strengthened the presumption that the
relevant omission was deliberate."
This sure reads as if the Dick, Donald, George and GOP gang have
been cought with their pants down. Create a law which should become a
Retroactive law, i.e. DTA 2005, but only in favor of the Government and
where the enemy combatant's retroactive rights are conveniently
ommitted.
It also allows the conclusion that the United States Constitution and
Statures simply cannot be denied or put away by introducing some fast
drafted amendment like the 2005 DTA act. This Supreme Ruling might even
lead the way to denounce the U.S. Patriot Act and its decendants. It
only takes a couple of brave men who are detained and are willing to
stand up.
It sure is interesting to know who actually are the Laywers for Salim
Ahmed Hamdan inside this case.
Yours Sincerely,
Robert M. Stockman
[1] HAMDAN v. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.
No. 05184. Argued March 28, 2006 Decided June 29, 2006
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/05-184.pdf
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
Hamdan vs Rumsfeld (Geneva Conventions now, Nuremberg Principles later)
From captainmay@prodigy.net Sun Jul 02 15:47:51 2006
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: stock@stokkie.net
Received: (qmail 17106 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2006 15:47:48 -0000
Received: from web81806.mail.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.207.171)
by stokkie.demon.nl with SMTP; 2 Jul 2006 15:47:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 93381 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jul 2006 15:47:14 -0000
Message-ID: 20060702154714.93379.qmail@web81806.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Received: from [71.143.132.79] by web81806.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 08:47:14 PDT
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Captain May
Subject: Hamdan vs Rumsfeld (Geneva Conventions now, Nuremberg Principles later)
To: "Robert M. Stockmann"
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44.0607020540040.17972-100000@hubble.stokkie.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Dear Mr. Stockmann,
I think the most striking conclusion of last week's Supreme Court
decision in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is that the executive branch -- all the
way to GWB -- is subject to the Geneva Convention. Further, I think it
but a step to go from the pertinence of the Geneva Convention to the
Principles of Nuremberg.
I'm in favor of both extensions of law -- and of common sense -- in
the atrocious matter of Gitmo, then later in Abu Ghraib (inter alia) in
Iraq and elsewhere, all directed by the current tenet of the White
House. These abuses were nothing more or less than the extension of
Israeli Mossad torture tactics to the Israel-Lobby-dominated US Dept.
of Defense, winked at by the Israel-Lobby-dominated US media. Were it
not for the fact that the Israel Lobby is behind it all, the hue and
cry (especially by US Jews) would have been deafening. After all (they
should argue but curiously don't), what the Neocons are rationalizing
as correct measures against the Arabs in the current era is nothing
more or less than what the Nazis rationalized as correct measures
against the Jews in a former era.
I'm of the firm opinion that until the Israel Lobby -- Zionism is my
preferred word, but I bow to the current lexicon -- is pointed out as
the key player in the Nazification of US policy, there will be no
substantial change, and the egregious techniques now introduced as
protection for the American People will be used against the American
People. This is always the way of emerging fascism, isn't it? That
the Israel Lobby won't condemn it argues strongly that they are behind
it.
As those who have followed my three-year mission of conscience have
learned, my background in military/media matters (military intelligence
and public affairs) has given me the knack of seeing where things are
going well in advance. This was the case in the matter of Abu Ghraib
and the war crimes we are committing there, as I pointed out what I
thought was happening and whither it tended to my senior Ghost Troop
officer, Ambassador Chase Untermeyer, currently the Bush League point
man in Qatar (CENTCOM HQ).
I close with a couple of links from September, 2003. I wrote what I
wrote at the time of the set-up of Muslim chaplain Captain James Yee,
who was accused of treason when I believed his aim was to report the
true nature of things to the US media (which was probably what betrayed
him to the Bush League). Both are part of my four-volume report to
Congress on media/military abuses in connection with the Battle of
Baghdad Cover-up (BOBCUP):
Email to Chase Untermeyer (22 Sept. 03):
http://www.ghosttroop.net/untermeyersep22.htm
Op-ed on Captain Yee & Captain Dreyfus (24 Sept. 03):
http://www.ghosttroop.net/yeedreyfus.htm
Please forward these links to such as may find them of interest. Lord
knows, the US media isn't going to do any digging or reporting into the
reality of things, so we have to continue to do it ourselves!
Best regards,
Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action
PS: I hope you have seen the column Ghost Troop published in Bush's
hometown Lone Star Iconoclast (in Crawford), which warns of a Bush
League terror event (probably in Texas) before the elections:
http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=248&z=37
[1] HAMDAN v. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.
No. 05184. Argued March 28, 2006 Decided June 29, 2006
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/05-184.pdf
[2] Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Petitioner v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, et al.
by Joshua Friedman
http://www.hamdanvrumsfeld.com/
David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 03:35:49 +0100 (CET)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann"
To: cloak.dagger@gmail.com, stefangrossmann@t-online.de,
too@slingshot.co.nz, skolnick@ameritech.net,
eric@vaticanassassins.org, tips@infowars.com,
prisonplanetweb@hotmail.com, tarpley@tarpley.net,
tom@tomflocco.com, takingaim@pacbell.net, stewwebb@sierranv.net,
prophecy@texemarrs.com, deadlinelive@yahoo.com,
webmaster@rense.com, wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com,
captainmay@prodigy.net, palast@gregpalast.com,
henry@savethemales.ca, leurenmoret@yahoo.com,
michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com, chamish@netvision.net.il
Subject: David's Law ??
Message-ID:
Hi,
As Mike Piper already correctly mentioned, a new House Bill has
been introduced : HR.254, a Law on Hate Speech.
Now, why would the greatest Nation on Earth need a Bill on hate Speech?
Maybe the USA ain't that great anymore, and to fit the economic ends
they insert this bill?
A law on hate speech is more of a nasty hack to have society "behave"
in a orderly fashion when being in times of economic downturn. These
kind of laws are only to "fight" the results of grim times, whereas
nothing is done, ON PURPOSE, to solve the real cause of the economic
downturn itself.
Last december Tim Rifat, a British Intelligence and Geo Political
Analyst with rather unconventional views, probably described it best :
http://crashrecovery.org/fatherfeeney/www/images/holohoax.gif
http://www.fatherfeeney.org/www/images/holohoax.gif
"In Western Europe, a neo-Stalin state, its illegal to discuss
history. Anyone starting a discussion will be arrested like David
Irving. In Europe there's law which forbid discussing history e.g.
the holocaust. We now have a Zionist empire of Europe where history
is written down as law and one is forbidden by law to discuss it."
Some say that Hate Speech Law, as a cure, is far far worse as the
disease itself. This kind of legislature can only feed on the back of
the population when Government itself keeps its eyes shut to :
- federal and state sponsored crime
- corruption
- usury
- tax extortion,
- bribes
- swindle etc.
which harm people inside their spending capacity. Hence people will
try to find out whats really going on.
Sadly enough, history has shown that, the moment people find out whats
really going on inside Government, hate speech laws will prevent them
from telling truth, where at the same time the deceptive media are most
brilliant in presenting false scape goats. Jewish survivors from nazi
germany know all too well about this.
Again, Hate Speech Law is a phenomenon which typically arises when
corruption has become the norm inside Government. A perfect example of
this is the former U.S.S.R. under Stalin. Hence my conclusion about
this bill is that :
HATE SPEECH LAW IS UN-AMERICAN
Its even UN-ISRAEL or UN-ZIONIST, or ANTI JEW! David's Law should be
called here by its real name :
STALIN's LAW OF HATE SPEECH
So Dear Representives : Please pass this piece of rag into the binster..
Here comes the full text of the Bill as a warning for future attempts
to be swiftly identified and removed :
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/c110query.html (Select "Bill Number" and search for HR254)
"------------------------------------------------------------------
David's Law (Introduced in House)
HR 254 IH
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H.R. 254
To enhance Federal enforcement of hate crimes, and for other
purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 5, 2007
Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
------------------------------------------------------------------
A BILL
To enhance Federal enforcement of hate crimes, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act
of 2007' or `David's Law'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that--
(1) the incidence of violence motivated by the actual or perceived
race, color, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender,
or disability of the victim poses a serious national problem;
(2) such violence disrupts the tranquility and safety of
communities and is deeply divisive;
(3) existing Federal law is inadequate to address this problem;
(4) such violence affects interstate commerce in many ways,
including--
(A) by impeding the movement of members of targeted groups and
forcing such members to move across State lines to escape the
incidence or risk of such violence; and
(B) by preventing members of targeted groups from purchasing goods
and services, obtaining or sustaining employment or participating
in other commercial activity;
(5) perpetrators cross State lines to commit such violence;
(6) instrumentalities of interstate commerce are used to facilitate
the commission of such violence;
(7) such violence is committed using articles that have traveled in
interstate commerce;
(8) violence motivated by bias that is a relic of slavery can
constitute badges and incidents of slavery;
(9) although many local jurisdictions have attempted to respond to
the challenges posed by such violence, the problem is sufficiently
serious, widespread, and interstate in scope to warrant Federal
intervention to assist such jurisdictions; and
(10) many States have no laws addressing violence based on the
actual or perceived race, color, national origin, religion, sexual
orientation, gender, or disability, of the victim, while other
States have laws that provide only limited protection.
SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF HATE CRIME.
In this Act, the term `hate crime' has the same meaning as in
section 280003(a) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement
Act of 1994 (28 U.S.C. 994 note).
( H.R.3355
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Enrolled as
Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate
SEC. 280003. DIRECTION TO UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
REGARDING SENTENCING ENHANCEMENTS FOR HATE CRIMES.
(a) DEFINITION- In this section, `hate crime' means a crime in which
the defendant intentionally selects a victim, or in the case of a
property crime , the property that is the object of the crime ,
because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national
origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any
person. )
SEC. 4. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN ACTS OF VIOLENCE.
Section 245 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and
(e), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
`(c)(1) Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law,
willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of
fire, a firearm, or an explosive device, attempts to cause bodily
injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race,
color, religion, or national origin of any person--
`(A) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, or fined in
accordance with this title, or both; and
`(B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or
fined in accordance with this title, or both if--
`(i) death results from the acts committed in violation of this
paragraph; or
`(ii) the acts committed in violation of this paragraph include
kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse
or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an
attempt to kill.
`(2)(A) Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any
circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully causes bodily
injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an
explosive device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person,
because of the actual or perceived religion, gender, sexual
orientation, or disability of any person--
`(i) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, or fined in
accordance with this title, or both; and
`(ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or
fined in accordance with this title, or both, if--
`(I) death results from the acts committed in violation of this
paragraph; or
`(II) the acts committed in violation of this paragraph include
kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse
or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an
attempt to kill.
`(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the circumstances described
in this subparagraph are that--
`(i) in connection with the offense, the defendant or the victim
travels in interstate or foreign commerce, uses a facility or
instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce, or engages in
any activity affecting interstate or foreign commerce; or
`(ii) the offense is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce.'.
SEC. 5. DUTIES OF FEDERAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
(a) Amendment of Federal Sentencing Guidelines- Pursuant to its
authority under section 994 of title 28, United States Code, the
United States Sentencing Commission shall study the issue of adult
recruitment of juveniles to commit hate crimes and shall, if
appropriate, amend the Federal sentencing guidelines to provide
sentencing enhancements (in addition to the sentencing enhancement
provided for the use of a minor during the commission of an
offense) for adult defendants who recruit juveniles to assist in
the commission of hate crimes.
(b) Consistency With Other Guidelines- In carrying out this
section, the United States Sentencing Commission shall--
(1) ensure that there is reasonable consistency with other Federal
sentencing guidelines; and
(2) avoid duplicative punishments for substantially the same
offense.
SEC. 6. GRANT PROGRAM.
(a) Authority To Make Grants- The Administrator of the Office of
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention of the Department of
Justice shall make grants, in accordance with such regulations as
the Attorney General may prescribe, to State and local programs
designed to combat hate crimes committed by juveniles.
(b) Authorization of Appropriations- There are authorized to be
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this
section.
SEC. 7. AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL TO ASSIST STATE AND
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT.
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of the
Treasury and the Department of Justice, including the Community
Relations Service, for fiscal years 2007, 2008, and 2009 such sums
as are necessary to increase the number of personnel to prevent and
respond to alleged violations of section 245 of title 18, United
States Code (as amended by this Act).
"------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers,
Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
references :
total 10448
-rw-rw-r-- 1 crashrec klant 1378371 Jun 29 2006 05-184.pdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 crashrec klant 7193864 Jan 28 2007 20070124_Wed_Piper.mp3
-rw-rw-r-- 1 crashrec klant 42909 Dec 3 05:37 h254ih.txt.pdf
-rw-rw-r-- 1 crashrec klant 1394134 Dec 3 05:34 h3355enr.txt.pdf
-rw-rw-r-- 1 crashrec klant 241747 Jul 7 21:22 HR6304pcs.txt.pdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 crashrec klant 254 Dec 3 05:46 MD5SUM
First published on Sun, 2 Jul 2006
Issues concerning the Desire of a New World Order
For anyone who can handle the Truth :
( mpg123 -@ http://republicbroadcasting.org/32k.pls ) |
 |
into ground shaking radio that will snap your neck in odd directions :
( mplayer "mms://196.44.225.194/channel islam"
on Tuesdays and Fridays at 22 CET/4PM EST/1PM Pacific. ) |
 |
The Home of Cutting Edge Talk Radio :
( mpg123 -@ http://www.oraclebroadcasting.com/48k.pls ) |
 |
"Report from IRON MOUNTAIN" Last edited on Fri, Jan 02, 2009
Contents :
REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN : On the Possibility and Desirability of Peace
Google's Ice Earth Hoax Day
L'histoire, se répète : Organic Fuel
Report from IRON MOUNTAIN : Microwaved!
Seperation of the world into 10 DVD region codes
Codex Alimentarius and the "Nutricide" Gig
The Dutch Milk Mafia
"Conspiracy of Cells: One Woman's Immortal Legacy - and the Medical Scandal It Caused"
Esophageal Cancer
Silent Tsunami
"Report from IRON MOUNTAIN" is a secret study by 15
researchers ordered by JFK in 1961. JFK got killed, Lyndon Johnsen
received the report in 1966, and kept it silent as bottom drawer
material. In 1967 one of the researchers who called himself "John Doe"
published it, and the media denounced it as a Hoax.... BUT...Never
before has a Hoax, "REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN ON THE POSSIBILITY AND
DESIRABILITY OF PEACE", developed into a accurate description of the
factual plans which are layed out before us, day by day.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 103332 Jan 2 22:54 ironmountain/index.html
75c792a85d901161cc8362a2ae65ab0f ironmountain/index.html
"A pre Jesuit history" Last edited on Sun, Dec 28, 2008
Contents :
A pre Jesuit history
The 1605 Gun Powder Plot debunked
Interview with Leo Zagami
The Coup inside the Vatican
Opus Dei Massacre and The Davinci Code
Kissinger to Serve As Papal Adviser?
Former 'Jesuit' Fr. Malachi Martin
A Jew as Catholic Cardinal
The Treaty of Rome, Mar 25, 1957
Catholic Church is "the one true Church of Christ"
THE BLACK POPE Hoax
The 'Black Pope' steps back
Downloads
A lot of controversy exists around the role of the
Jesuit order in obtaining a new world order. To fully understand this
role, a history overview is presented.
-rw-r--r-- 2 crashrec klant 144894 Dec 28 21:31 jesuit/index.html
c94178dcfff45297b6a638e8ca0cdc94 jesuit/index.html
"The Infowar Techniques of the Rendon Group: a possible theory " Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
The Infowar Techniques of the Rendon Group: a possible theory
The Trial of 'Scooter' Libby
CIA Whites Out National Intelligence Estimate
Whats up with Condoleeza's eyes?
Irving Lewis Leibowitz
Ray McGovern's open letter
Ambassador Richard W. Carlson
Downloads
As all the info coming to us is mostly in online
articles and videos, The White House outsourced propaganda to company's
like The Rendon Group. As no-one is able to visit the place of
terrorist attacks to make a independent report, faking news is a easy
task. If a fascist group propagates false propaganda using forged
documents like the yellow cake ones, the emerging picture becomes a
evil nightmare. James Bamford wrote a couple of articles about the
Rendon Group. John Rendon and the U.S. propoganda . I think this goes
even further, like the ultimate "1984" scenario, The Infowar Techniques
of the Rendon Group: a possible theory. Recently the Trial of Scooter
Libby was brought for the Grand Jury for a final verdict. A overview is
given on how Valerie Plame's Non Official Cover (NOC) for the CIA was
leaked to the press.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 71011 Dec 26 18:54 rendon/index.html
7cd494d5e3f5fd968e6307f4a22d43a0 rendon/index.html
"911 was a Mossad Operation" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
911 was a Mossad Operation
Barbara Olson was on Flight 77, BBC reports!
Rafi Eitan: Ready shelters for Iran attack
FOX News : Israelis Spying in and on the US
Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
The 'Bollyn' Website
The bollyn.com domainname scam
THE RUMOR MILL NEWS AGENCY
The Bijlmer disaster
Was the Mossad involved in the JFK Assassination 1963 ?
The New Hampshire Vote Fraud
The USS Liberty attack : OPERATION CYANIDE
WTC 270 ton beam flew over highway
9-11 WTC: CONFUSION AROUND 270 TON FLYING DETAIL
REBUTTAL ARGUMENT: YES, 270 TONS AND MORE DID FLY SIDEWAYS
Barry Jennings interviewed at MIKE'S PAPAYA
Downloads
Evidence is presented which show Mossad involvement
in the 911 Attacks on the World Trade Center.
-rw-r--r-- 2 crashrec klant 182823 Dec 26 18:54 911/index.html
ae2dad59fa65dd33b7706969d74bdc5b 911/index.html
The Curse of Canaan, A Demonology of History Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
The Curse of Canaan, A Demonology of History
Ezra Pound, the ultimate researcher of the unknown and hidden
The Curse inside Dictionaries
Khazarian Smokescreen in the Caucasus
Commentaries on the Curse
Downloads
Eustace Mullins, a protege of the late poet and
novelist Ezra Pound, who wrote the book "The Secrets of the Federal
Reserve", presents history from beginning of time to present day with
"The Curse of Canaan", as laid out inside the Holy Bible, as guideline.
His findings of fact are most worrying with regards to the survival of
mankind and humanity as we have known it.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 58953 Dec 26 18:54 canaan/index.html
d5105bfc1f6ae356baa03dce0f99fbc0 canaan/index.html
MOSSAD's control over the Internet Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
The Mossad takeover of popular Webmail
MOSSAD takes over MOSNEWS.COM
Re: MOSSAD takes over MOSNEWS.COM
High Alert, good websites get taken down
Cloak and Dagger under blackbox routing attack
Compromised DNS backbone providers
Re: [IANA #91363] Compromised DNS backbone providers
Keyboard JitterBug eavesdropping
The Anti Spam Controversy
Downloads
The Mossad and affiliated organizations nowadays try to
control or even takeover popular websites and email services.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 86549 Dec 26 18:54 internet/index.html
5ff90cb3430e166779da8f6c3bf1937d internet/index.html
THE MONEY MASTERS Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
"THE UNITED STATES IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY"
The Confederacy and the Federal Union
Gold Warriors
More troops in Iraq?
The state of our union
Eminent Domain
The Empire's Echelon
The ABN Amro takeover
Don't Invest in Money Standards
"MEET THE WORLD MONEY POWER"
Re: The Emperor has NO Clothes
PROTOCOL No. 20, Financial Programme
Bankrupt on Credit
Downloads
the money masters documentary from 1996 is a
classic. Its a stunning expose of history and governmental conduct
explained in a straightforward manner with money and power as sole
motive, bypassing conflicts of religion, race and other cooked up
charges. The best circumstantial supporting evidence for this is maybe
the banning of The Money Masters dvd on amazon.com and sort alike
retail shops, and of course on google and youtube video.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 119726 Dec 26 18:53 moneymasters/index.html
fc053810bcaba52c2b4f67c1c27b8ab6 moneymasters/index.html
"HAMDAN v. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL." Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
Rahm Emanual, Obama and H.R.3604
HAMDAN v. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.
David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007
Downloads
An analysis which shows how the Bush administration
reflected to this law case.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 69137 Dec 26 18:53 hamdan/index.html
ae6432d205f7282a0d2b11adf1835f36 hamdan/index.html
"The Illuminati and the Counsel on Foreign Relations Conspiracy" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
The Illuminati and the Counsel on Foreign Relations
Harry Hopkins
Silent Book/DVD Censorship in the free western world
Re: The 'Ugly Secret' Of World War Two
Barack Zeke Midas Obama
Downloads
Myron C. Fagan, a Hollywood Writer Director, was given access in 1945
to evidence from "Illuminati" circles comprising a set of micro-films
and recordings of the SECRET meetings at Yalta attended only by
Franklin Roosevelt, Alger Hiss, Harry Hopkins, Stalin, Molotov, and
Vishinsky when they hatched the plot to deliver the Balkans, Eastern
Europe and Berlin to Stalin. A month after the Six-Day war and the
attack on the USS Liberty, Fagan stepped forward in July 1967 and
presented his knowledge in a audio recording, today available in mp3
format.
-rw-r--r-- 2 crashrec klant 76707 Dec 26 18:53 fagan/index.html
73a1f310a89c396f61b5cffd5c711898 fagan/index.html
"Russian Israeli duel for power, oil and dirty cash" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
The real Master(s) in control
Alexander Litvinenko
Chief of Russian Gas Company Shot Dead
Russian MP Crashes His Million Dollar Ferrari in France
Boris Berezovsky
Vreeland's notes and the Oligarch Connection
Michael Chertoff and the Russian Mafiya
"A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties"
The Dutch Real Estate business
Bobby Fischer, America's intellectual hero
Putin's role
The Takeover Of America according Brig. General Ben Partin
Downloads
A report about Yukos OIL and the assassinations
recently observed. This battle is part of a world coup as we will find
out. 911 is just the beginning.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 144119 Dec 26 18:53 fischer/index.html
a7211c17c854dafa8bdc7dd9e9128e5a fischer/index.html
"HITLER was a BRITISH AGENT" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
"HITLER was a BRITISH AGENT"
Top Kiwis Smeared
House of Stuart, Sinclair and Wettin
The Trojan Prime Ministers
Downloads
Greg Hallett, a researcher and writer from the
intelligence community wrote a book titled "Hitler was a BRITISH
AGENT". a interesting and intriguing book which presents a theory which
fits like a glove inside the official stories and official biographies
published since the 1970's on the subject. Normally a person never
would even think of this possibility, but Greg Hallett's contacts from
the community have issued numerous hints and warnings. The disturbing
trends in global geo-politics we all have seen happening since 2001,
left Hallett not much room as to publish this book.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 64373 Dec 26 18:53 hallett/index.html
d4862067fe3e66bc249b8a8832949315 hallett/index.html
"Benjamin Freedman warns America" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
Benjamin Freedman warns America
Zionism Exposed
The Cause of Our Conflict
Revelation exposes the Rev. Hagee movement
Vindication
Fired from Oxford : Edward Gibbon (1737-1794)
The secret history of the 2nd Amendment
A note on Eric Hufschmid
Endpoint Software, Goleta CA
Eric Phelps on Zionism
The GCN v. RBN battle
The Deguello Report Hoax
Downloads
In the 1960's a former insider at the highest
levels of Jewish organizations inside America stepped forward and
warned the public what most probable was going to happen. Almost all he
predicted to happen has in fact become a reality today.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 160105 Dec 26 18:53 freedman/index.html
99f39c5c4fd4368f2456c571a5718cf4 freedman/index.html
EU Software Patent Directive Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
Transcript of the EU Council on the Software Patent Directive
Queen abdicates her constitutional responsibility
"Total Controlled Demolition" Copyright
Downloads
On Mar 7, 2005 the EU Commission tried to pass the controversial EU
Software Patent Directive, neglecting Democratic rule inside EU
Parliament. On Feb 27, 2006 former Soviet Dissident Vladimir Bukovksy
warns for EU Dictatorship. On Dec 12, 2007 The EU Commission and
Council denied the referendum as part of the Democratic process to
create the European Constitution. It just seems that PART THREE
of the book "Waters flowing Eastward, The War against the Kingship of
Christ" by L.Fry titled "THE SOVIETIZATION OF GREAT BRITIAN AND THE UNITED
STATES" is indeed in full progress.
-rw-r--r-- 4 crashrec klant 29112 Dec 26 18:53 council-transcript/index.html
745003ecd8d0904ae542dd1f87fa872c council-transcript/index.html
"Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
"Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine"
Art Bell - The Philidelphia Experiment - Al Bielek
The Temple of Man
Stellar Death Shrouds : The all-seeing evil eye?
Downloads
"The Earth is not moving" is a astounding scholarly work
debunking the BIGGEST DECEPTION laid upon the grand public by the
Science Establishment ever. What Deception? The Heliocentric system
turns out to be a fabricated model of our planetary system, which
started around the year 1600, whilest the King James Bible was getting
translated. Marshall Hall starts of by mentioning that all NASA
calculations which should deliver the highest accuracy are based on a
non-moving earth!!
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 49660 Dec 26 18:53 fixedearth/index.html
7540888e2c82c8fa8215282965948308 fixedearth/index.html
"Susan Lindauer -- Reporter Held Political Prisoner" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
In March 2001 Susan Lindauer carried a message from
the Iraqi government to her cousin, the White House Chief of Staff,
requesting the return of weapons inspectors. But Bush nevertheless
attacked and invaded Iraq using WMD as a pretext, murdered as many as
500,000 people, and spread radioactive poison over the entire country,
which will murder millions more.
Susan Lindauer was for over period of almost a year in prison on false
claims of insanity, sentenced on Feb 15, 2006 by then U.S. District
Judge Michael Mukasey. On Sept. 8, 2006 the forced mental
hospitalization was however dropped by Mukasey, and she was
subsequently released. A most weird case as the hearings carousel is
continuing to this very day.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 15267 Dec 26 18:53 lindauer/index.html
1d6333091ecf197ae088a1005a9921ce lindauer/index.html
"To Eliminate the Opiate" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
To Eliminate The Opiate, Vol.1 Vol.2
The Hebrew Bible : from Aleppo Codex to "Rothschild Mahzor"
Post WWII Bibles seriously flawed
Downloads
Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman wrote a two volume book
which presents a overwhelming amount of evidence, names, dates and
events throughout the last century's which describe the abolishment of
Religion, in particular the Jewish, in order to spiritually dumb down
the grand public, in effect eliminating The Opiate of the people, their
religion as stated inside the Illuminati masterplan.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 52690 Dec 26 18:53 antelman/index.html
4a1868f8b78c0850b6c3c824448018e3 antelman/index.html
"The History of Mind Control" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
The History of Mind Control
Jewry, the biggest identity theft in the history of mankind
Mysterious Monuments and Buildings
Downloads
A hands-on down to earth summary about mind control
is given, and next the history of Mind Control inside the USA is
presented.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 25637 Dec 26 18:53 mindcontrol/index.html
bd512b7df1cbe10b05b28d5e540f8a62 mindcontrol/index.html
The secret Downing Street memo Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
Kelly had 'no right' to anonymity
The secret Downing Street memo
Memo: Bush manipulated Iraq intel
Bush asked to explain UK war memo
Indignation Grows in U.S. Over British Prewar Documents
Downloads
David Kelly was a renowned Weapons Inspector for the U.N. and U.K.
Military. A 2002 dossier titled "IRAQ'S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION"
triggered Kelly for a renewed WMD inspection inside Iraq and became
convinced that the only purpose of the IRAQ WMD dossier had been to get
a war going in Iraq. After testifying before the UK Congress, Kelly
went missing and was found dead on July 18, 2003. The Lord Hutton
inquiry concluded that Kelly had committed 'suicide'. Then on May 1,
2005 a verbatim copy of a secret "Downing Street memo" from July 23,
2002 was published stating that "intelligence and facts were being
fixed around the policy" to get a war going in Iraq. The
authenticity of this document, to this very day, has not been
disputed.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 42266 Dec 26 18:53 kelly/index.html
1a36ef8cdfd45e35124982798ed9edcc kelly/index.html
"Satanic Voices, Ancient & Modern" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Contents :
"Satanic Voices, Ancient & Modern"
"The Islam needs a French Revolution"
Chirac's apprentice
Downloads
David Musa Pidcock, a leading figure from the Islamic Party of Britain,
found himself seriously offended with many other people with Islamic
believes, when in 1988 Salman Rushdie published his book "Satanic Verses".
The media hype on tv was almost ludricous with how Satanic
Verses was promoted into highest circles of the 'Literature establishment'.
Pidcock however lowered his blood pressure and wrote a respons titled
"Satanic Voices, Ancient & Modern", which indeed, as he describes,
is a game set and match expose on the subject.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 48448 Dec 26 18:53 pidcock/index.html
cffff4e5e7a5f603f8dbad5de91df35b pidcock/index.html
"Testimonials of Illuminati and Zionist
influence in Present Day America" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Norman Dodd, Paul Findley and Alan Hart present
their findings of facts which have directed America towards a highly
controversial direction, where as the late Norman Dodd stated : "Since
World War one, the men who lead this country, have institutionalized
conflicting interests to such an extend that they can never be
resolved. The Tax-Exempt foundations like the Cargenie Endowment, The
Ford and Rockerfeller foundation have been instrumental in this"
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 10395 Dec 26 18:53 testimonials/index.html
ac5a851436071ac5da666206e90e6e90 testimonials/index.html
"The NWO : a Tarnung by Teutonic Knights?" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
The Vatican Church has supported the Nazi's in the
1930's 40's and 50's. This connection turns out to be a very old one,
as middle eave Popes were emanating the agenda and mindset for the
crusades. This Nazi connection actually turns out to be a Teutonic
connection.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 13160 Dec 26 18:53 teutonic/index.html
b4418384e4dd53e22bf15c35bba69d65 teutonic/index.html
"Fr. Leonard Feeney M.I.C.M." Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
A catholic Jesuit priest published a number of
articles in the 1950s illustrating numerous efforts by governmental
sponsored groups to systematic abolish the Catholic Religion and
religious faith in general.
-rw-rw-r-- 3 crashrec klant 5654 Dec 26 18:53 fatherfeeney/index.html
a92383f048c341092665c33dfa9829ad fatherfeeney/index.html
"The protocols are for real" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
Barry Chamish, a political writer from Israel has
connected some dots regarding "the protocols of the learned elders of
Zion" which seem not to be the playbook of the Jewish people, but turn
out to be a masterplan designed by the Illuminati to take over the
world. A masterplan which denounces all wellbeing and prospering of
normal people.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 27205 Dec 26 18:53 chamish/index.html
96ca8dfdfe6af505e227fb7317f42735 chamish/index.html
Louis Madelin, "La Revolution" Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
a analysis about the French Revolution, still to be
completed and translated.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 28310 Dec 26 18:53 madelin/index.html
af9c7b7c8044e11488657a27e46a6d4f madelin/index.html
"U.S. Patent No. 4,686,605 : H.A.A.R.P." Last edited on Fri, Dec 26, 2008
A illustration of how H.A.A.R.P works in practice,
based on a U.S. Patent document.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 15527 Dec 26 18:53 haarp/index.html
ea47220b98929df89cd92c8539cd9ab3 haarp/index.html
King James Reference Bible Last edited on Thu, Mar 08, 2007
A lot of content concerning the NWO is somehow
related to the Bible. As a convenience i present a restaurated
copy of http://www.htmlbible.com/ which recently somehow disappeared
from the internet.
-rw-r--r-- 4 htbible klant 348 Mar 8 2007 htbible/index.html
36050cb040cc8bb8212411aefe640e11 htbible/index.html
To verify the md5sum checksum and file sizes, load
the same url, with https.
So when you have http://crashrecovery.org/moneymasters/ inside your
browser, reload the same url with
https://crashrecovery.org/moneymasters/ in a new window or tab and
save the new loaded page as a file, i.e. internet.html. The md5
checksum and file size of internet.html should be the same as
internet/index.html as listed above.
Note that the "Save Page As..."
option in many modern browserslike e.g. Mozilla Firefox produces bad
md5 checksums. Somehow some extra garbage html is added. In such cases
one should use wget and md5sum.
For the Microsoft Windows platform see
wget and md5sums. Wget version
1.10 on Windows is currently a mess when using https, so get version
1.9.1. I recommend to download
ftp://ftp.sunsite.dk/projects/wget/windows/wget-1.9.1b.zip ,
ftp://ftp.sunsite.dk/projects/wget/windows/ssllibs097c.zip and http://www.pc-tools.net/files/win32/freeware/md5sums-1.2.zip
Unzip the
contents of these three zipfiles into a directory (Folder) and proceed as
follows from the windows command shell cmd.exe :
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\check>dir
Volume in drive C has no label.
Volume Serial Number is 04B8-FFFC
Directory of C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\check
04/15/2008 12:33 PM <DIR> .
04/15/2008 12:33 PM <DIR> ..
10/01/2003 10:50 AM 876,544 libeay32.dll
01/31/2005 01:20 AM 28,160 md5sums.exe
01/31/2005 07:51 PM 4,205 md5sums.txt
11/07/2003 03:38 PM 16,121 News
11/14/2003 02:23 PM 375 Readme.txt
11/30/2001 08:32 AM 4,022 sample.wgetrc
10/01/2003 10:50 AM 159,744 ssleay32.dll
11/14/2003 02:19 PM 225,280 wget.exe
11/14/2003 02:19 PM 148,259 wget.hlp
11/14/2003 02:19 PM 186,238 wget.html
10 File(s) 1,648,948 bytes
2 Dir(s) 372,518,912 bytes free
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\check>
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\check>
wget https://www1.crashrecovery.org/moneymasters/index.html
--12:43:44-- https://www1.crashrecovery.org/moneymasters/index.html
=> `index.html'
Resolving www1.crashrecovery.org... 10.0.18.84
Connecting to www1.crashrecovery.org[10.0.18.84]:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 95,659 [text/html]
100%[====================================>] 95,659 --.--K/s
12:43:44 (1.94 MB/s) - `index.html' saved [95659/95659]
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\check>md5sums index.html
MD5sums 1.2 freeware for Win9x/ME/NT/2000/XP+
Copyright (C) 2001-2005 Jem Berkes - http://www.pc-tools.net/
Type md5sums -h for help
[Path] / filename MD5 sum
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\check\]
index.html d6080d29d30085ac82d9c2ed39729294
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\check>
which corresponds with :
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 95659 Apr 15 07:55 moneymasters/index.html
d6080d29d30085ac82d9c2ed39729294 moneymasters/index.html
Robert M. Stockmann
Last changed Fri Jan 2 22:54:23 CET 2009
|
|
