Wayback Machine
Jan FEB Mar
Previous capture 13 Next capture
2008 2009 2010
1 captures
13 Feb 09 - 13 Feb 09
Close Help

Monday, February 09, 2009

Bishop Williamson is dismissed as Seminary Rector

(Hoffman's analysis follows this article)

Argentine seminary ousts Holocaust-denying bishop

Associated Press | Feb. 9, 2009

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina – A Roman Catholic bishop whose denials of the Holocaust led to Vatican demands he recant has been removed as the head of an Argentine seminary. The ultraconservative Society of St. Pius X said in a statement e-mailed Monday to The Associated Press that it has dismissed British Bishop Richard Williamson as director of its seminary in La Reja, outside Buenos Aires.

"The statements from Monsignor Williamson do not in any way reflect the position of our congregation," said Father Christian Bouchacourt, the society's South American superior. "A Catholic bishop cannot speak with ecclesiastical authority except on matters concerning faith and morality. Our brotherhood does not claim any authority over other questions."

Williamson is one of four bishops from the society whose excommunications were lifted in January by Pope Benedict XVI. But under pressure from German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the Vatican has demanded that Williamson recant his denial of the Holocaust before he can be admitted as a Roman Catholic bishop.

Williamson has said he does not believe Jews were gassed during the Holocaust. He has apologized to the pope for having stirred controversy, but has not repudiated his comments that only 200,000 to 300,000 Jews were killed during World War II rather than the 6 million commonly estimated.

He reportedly also expressed similar views while serving as rector of the St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in Winona, Minnesota, between 1988 and 2003. "There was not one Jew killed in the gas chambers. It was all lies, lies, lies," Williamson said in a 1989 speech at Notre-Dame-de-Lourdes church in Sherbrooke, Canada, the Winona Daily News reported Sunday. In the same speech, the paper said Williamson also claimed that "the Jews created the Holocaust so we would prostrate ourselves on our knees before them and approve of their new State of Israel ... Jews made up the Holocaust, Protestants get their orders from the devil and the Vatican has sold its soul to liberalism."

The Daily News reported that the bishop also wrote letters in 2001 and 2002 blaming "Judeo-Masonry" for the two world wars and claiming that Jews were bent on world domination.

The German weekly Der Spiegel reported Saturday that Williamson does not plan to immediately comply with the Vatican's demand that he recant and has rejected a suggestion that he might visit the former Auschwitz death camp.

Williamson said he would correct himself if he is satisfied by the evidence, but insisted that examining it "will take time," Der Spiegel reported. Several efforts by The Associated Press to reach Williamson at his home in La Reja have been unsuccessful. On Sunday, Merkel spoke by phone with the pope in a conversation characterized by "common deep concern about the perpetual warning of the Shoah for humanity," according to a joint statement with German-born Pope Benedict XVI. Shoah is a Hebrew word for the Holocaust. The reversal of Williamson's excommunication has revived strains in relations between the Vatican and Jews.



1. The insinuation of Father Christian Bouchacourt, the society's South American superior ("A Catholic bishop cannot speak with ecclesiastical authority except on matters concerning faith and morality. Our brotherhood does not claim any authority over other questions") is that Williamson was removed as seminary rector not for doubting execution gas chambers in Auschwitz, but for violating the protocol of the Society of St. Pius X concerning statements by prelates that are beyond "faith and morality."

First, The rabbinic "Shoah" is a Trojan horse inside Christianity and its refutation does indeed concern "faith and morality" since it betrays the Gospel by derogating Calvary and substituting it with Auschwitz as the central martyrdom of western history (there are other ominous aspects of  "Shoah" mysticism, I will reserve these for exposition at a later time).

The Society of St. Pius X's German superior, Franz Schmidberger, has recently castigated the Islamic prophet Muhammad, suggesting that he was a child molester for allegedly marrying girls under the age of nine. Applying the Society of St. Pius X's criterion for dismissing Bishop Williamson as seminary rector, will the Society also, on the same grounds ("A Catholic bishop cannot speak with ecclesiastical authority except on matters concerning faith and morality") dismiss Rev. Schmidberger from his post in Germany?

I think not. Rev. Schmidberger's statement does not offend the Israeli and German rabbinate and Zionists. In fact, it is very amenable to them. Consequently, he will not be removed. Let us not indulge in semantic games, or mince words: Bishop Williamson was removed because he offended the rabbis and the Zionists, not because he besmirched Jesus Christ, or told a lie. The criterion for removal from office in the modern Catholic Church is that which pleases or offends rabbis and Zionists. Everything else is diplomatic jargon employed to conceal this sickening fact.

Rev. Fr. Schmidberger's observation concerning Muhammad, as we noted, has not caused him to be removed from his post in the Society of St. Pius X. In fact, it may even have elevated his status and burnished his credentials. As we have long noted in this column, it is a sign of the crippled nature of pseudo-conservatism, deeply distorted by the modern Neoncon philosophy of Leo Strauss, that everything critical that is forbidden to be revealed about Judaism can and quite often is said about Islam.

This is easy to prove. If Schmidberger were to pick up this writer's book, Judaism Discovered and turn to the section on sexuality, he would find, from the rabbinic texts themselves (aus ihren eigenem werken gezogen), that Orthodox Judaism creates a loophole for homosexual sex between males. It also permits the molestation of little boys under the age of nine, by men, women or even their own mothers. This permission is from the sacred rabbinic texts as documented in Judaism Discovered (wherein the texts in question are photographically reproduced).

Furthermore, if  there is an obligation to expose religions that allow sex with little girls, then Muhammad's alleged marital offense pales in comparison with the rabbinic loophole for sex with baby girls under three-years-old. Where is the Catholic publicity and outrage for this horror? Instead, nothing but absolute silence from the bold proclaimers of Islamic perfidy.

If Rev. Schmidberger was presented with this truth about the sex lives of Orthodox rabbis, does anyone really imagine that he would publicly declare this truth and still retain his position in the Society of St. Pius X, or the Catholic Church? Yet is not the dissemination of this and all other inconvenient truths about Judaism of the utmost importance in halting its growing supremacy in the Church, our society and national governments?

2. As we predicted, Bishop Williamson has no automatic disposition to "recant." Under pressure from no less a figure than the Roman Pontiff who ordered him to fall prostrate before the homicidal gas chamber fable, he "does not plan to immediately comply with the Vatican's demand that he recant..." Printers, stop the presses. Historians, hold your manuscripts. A new page in the chronicle of our times is about to be written: "One honest man against the priests of Baal."

In what is a theological arena, with a papal imprimatur bestowed upon the homicidal gas chambers, and the rabbis' Shoah" mystification boring into the bowels of the Church, we think back to the accusation of Ahab against the prophet Elijah. The prophet would not recant and submit to the priests of Baal. As a result, King Ahab labeled Elijah a "troubler of Israel" (I Kings 18: 17-18);  in other words, what the Zionists and rabbis of the modern world deem an "antisemite" 

The Ahabs of our time are desperate to frame l'affaire Williamson as a case of the Haters vs. the Jews. But pay heed to how the prophet Elijah replied to King Ahab: "I have not troubled Israel, but you have, and your father's house, because you have  abandoned the commandments of the Lord and followed the Baals." 

The notion that the welfare of Judaic people is linked to rejecting Jesus Christ, maintaining racist hegemony over the Palestinians and persecuting revisionist skeptics, is a demonic trick.  Truth is good for Judaics as well as all people. As long as they are captive to the rabbis of Baal and the mass murderers who lead counterfeit-Israel in Palestine, Judaics will be bound to a destiny as oppressors. Bishop Williamson does not seek to trouble "the Jews." He is in a battle with those who have abandoned the commandments of Christ to follow the priests of Baal. Judaics of good will ought to support him in this struggle, which is a struggle to free not only the German people, but also Judaic people from centuries of mental enslavement at the hands of the Orthodox rabbinate and its partner, the modernist Vatican.

3. The Associated Press reports that Williamson has been extended an invitation to visit Auschwitz, as if a visit to that wax museum is some sort of ultimate rebuttal to homicidal gas chamber skeptics. The Swedish-Judaic revisionist Ditlieb Felderer investigated Auschwitz-Birkenau twenty-seven times in the 1970s,  taking thousands of photos of faked crematoria chimneys, and facilities with wooden doors presented to tourists as execution gas chambers. Fred Leutcher has been there. Robert Faurisson and many other revisionist sleuths have also studied it on-site. Ernst Zundel, currently imprisoned in Germany for his writings, embraced the Judaic dissident David Cole in Auschwitz. A tour of Auschwitz is what every acolyte of Holocaustolatry should undertake in the company of a forensic revisionist.

The fable of killing gas chambers in Auschwitz cannot endure debate or scientific inquiry. This fable can only be sustained by repression against people like Bishop Williamson and threats to prosecute and jail him. He has lost his seminary rectorship. Let us see what else they will take away as they put the inquisitorial screws to him.

Hoffman is the author of Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit.


From the New York Times (dated "February 10, 2009" but on their website Feb. 9):

Bishop Who Denied Holocaust Ousted


ROME — The rehabilitated bishop at the heart of a Vatican uproar for denying the Holocaust has been dismissed as the head of an Argentine seminary. The seminary announced the dismissal on Sunday in a statement that said the bishop, Richard Williamson was no longer the director of the La Reja seminary on the outskirts of the Argentina capital. He has said the “historical evidence” argues against Nazi gas chambers and said that only 200,000 to 300,000 people died in concentration camps in the Holocaust. Bishop Williamson’s views “in no way reflect the position of our congregation,” the Rev. Christian Bouchacourt, the director of the Latin America branch of the Catholic Society of St. Pius X, said in the statement. He expressed “sadness” that Bishop Williamson’s statements had “discredited” the congregation. Pope Benedict XVI provoked widespread anger last month when he rescinded the excommunications of Bishop Williamson and three fellow bishops, all members of the Society of St. Pius X, as part of an effort to heal a 20-year schism.

Apparently surprised by the vociferous reaction to the rehabilitation of Bishop Williamson, including unusual public criticism from Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, the pope’s native country, the Vatican said Bishop Williamson must recant his views on the Holocaust.

The pope has also made efforts to soothe offended relations with Jews and other groups angered by Bishop Williamson’s rehabilitation, saying he had been unaware of the bishop’s views.

News of Bishop Williamson’s dismissal from the Argentine seminary came after the pope and Chancellor Merkel had a “cordial and constructive” phone conversation, spokesmen for both said Sunday. A joint statement issued Sunday by the Vatican and the chancellor’s office said that both the pope and Mrs. Merkel referred to Benedict’s Jan. 28 remarks condemning Holocaust denial and expressing solidarity with Jews.

A statement released Wednesday by the Vatican Secretariat of State called on Bishop Williamson to recant his comments. In a rare case of the Vatican’s diplomatic arm furthering remarks by the pope, the Secretariat of State also made clear that the traditionalist bishops would not be welcomed back into full communion with the Roman Catholic Church unless they accepted the liberalizing teachings of the Second Vatican Council.

Last week’s statement by the Secretariat of State seemed to repair relations with the Chief Rabbinate of Israel, which plans to continue its dialogue with the Vatican, said its director general, Oded Wiener. The body had asked to postpone a March meeting with the Vatican in protest. Vatican officials are expected to meet Thursday with the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, an umbrella organization.

(Emphasis supplied)



Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

You keep saying the Pope is ordering the bishop to recant. But I see no evidence of the Pope in any of the statements issuing from the Vatican. The Vatican is not the Pope and the Pope is not the Vatican.As I have warned you about this in a previous comment and you insist on laying the blame at the feet of the Pope I can only assume that you are rabidly and ignorantly opposed to everything Catholic and as such are no better than those you rail against. Don't forget, Williamson is a Catholic.(Analyse the word ignorant- it means to deliberately ignore)

Anonymous said...

If even one human being is unjustly killed because of his/her race it can be considered an act of genocide.

That many thousands of people died in Nazi Concentration Camps cannot be disputed: however, over fifty million people died in that war: To say that "six million" people were put to death under
"special" circumstances requires nothing short of a full and impartial investigation.

Is it not a crime in and of itself to imprison people for merely questioning the "number" of people killed in Nazi concentration camps? Yet the fact remains; people are in German prisons for this very reason.

Certainly, anti-Semitism is a horrible thing to be a party to, but is it truly anti-Semitism to merely question "numbers"?

Is it not possible to objectively investigate whether or not there were gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps and if found to be so, were they used to systematically and officially murder human beings -- no matter the number or even the nationality of those people?

I compliment the Bishop for his demonstrated integrity in this matter. He has nothing to gain and everything to lose and yet he evidently perfers "investigative proof" over emotional "conjecture".

Must we wait another 500 years to find out that the earth is, in truth, of global configuration? --jws

Mission Impossible said...

Michael, I salute your brave and persistent efforts to analyse this story properly, for the benefit of those who still have control of their own minds.

I note that (not unusually) some of your Commenters prefer pettiness to constructive dialogue when posting their contributions. We are in a very serious situation right now, and to argue over whether the Pope is directly involved in the Bishop Williamson issue, or not, is surely the height of irrelevance.

It pays to stick to the fundamentals. The term 'anti-Semitism' has no currency. It is a fallacious term. There has never been a race of Semites. The word 'Semitic' has only ever referred to a family of languages. The ancient Khazar language was never a Semitic tongue.

The demonization of the German people began long before the rise of Hitler and the Nazis (as I am sure you already know, Michael). It was a widely discussed topic in the American media of the mid to late 19th century.

We need to remind ourselves: the German race represents the very core of European civilization and is the bedrock of the White Race. It is for these reasons that Germany has been singled out, by the Khazars and their Ashkenazi descendents, as a target for their never ending racist vitriol.

The Sephardic Jews of France were barely touched by Nazi Germany, whilst their venom was reserved specifically for the East European Jews (namely those ancient 'Jewish' cantons in Poland, Hungary, and the Ukraine, etc.). This suggests they knew their race enemy was not Jews per se, but rather the Khazars and their Ashkenazi descendants.

Sadly for the Western World --- and now the whole world due to the collapse of the American economy and the Western (aka International 'Jew' Banking system) --- those Polish and East European Jews flooded into the USA (New York, Chicago, especially) between 1880 and 1915. The famed Statue of Liberty was in fact dedicated to them, and them alone. It was even erected within a stones throw of one of New York's earliest 'Jewish' ghettoes.

There is no such thing as the Jewish race, but there is such a thing as a Khazar gene pool, which has infiltrated the Caucasian gene pool, and especially its so-called elite bloodlines.

The 'Killing Fields of Cambodia' witnessed the genocide of circa 2-million over a period of 8 to 10 years; a genocide that occurred in far more primitive and brutal conditions (including tropical diseases). German efficiency is legendary, but even a fool struggles to make sense of 6-million 'Jews' allegedly killed in just 3-1/2 years! Never in all their history have the German people demonstrated such a calculated predilection for genocide, barbarity, and dishonour. For example, Field Marshall Rommel epitomized German chivalry in North Africa. Despite their fully justified anger against the descendants of the Khazars, the Germans simply do not have the temperament to mount a systematic campaign of cold-blooded murder that might account for 2-million deaths, let alone 6-million! We need to remind ourselves that from 1943 onwards, the German armed forces were fighting for their very survival as a race. Most educated Germans were well aware that the Kharzars/Ashkenazis were already in political and economic control of America and that some their most influential politicians were planning to eradicate the German race once they had been defeated militarily.

Every society has its nutters and psychopaths, so let us assume some deranged German individuals managed to hold influential positions in 50% of the concentration camps housing 'Jews.' How could such a relatively small number have ever orchestrated a mass killing spree? Just apply logic. Imagine someone attempting the same feat today. How could it be achieved? It's an impossibility, without the dropping of nuclear fission explosives.

What I am seeking to demonstrate is that whichever way you look at the Holocaust Myth, you can punch holes through it. It can ONLY be nothing more than a well-constructed and devious hoax.

What people fail to understand is that Polish 'Jews' performed a genocide upon German people at Bromberg (spelling?), either just prior to, or immediately after the launch of WWII. Part of the cruelty shown to Polish 'Jews' by German forces was in direct response to the Bromberg atrocity: simple revenge. We fail to understand these oft-forgotten timelines at our own peril. Indeed, throughout the 1930s, the Germanic people living in Danzig and along its corridor were routinely harassed, abused, and murdered by Polish 'Jews.' That is a lot of provocation!

Unlike France with its predominantly Sephardic Jewish population, Germany was always the fault line between Caucasian Europe and those lands to the East that had been well infiltrated by the Khazar gene pool. The Germans thus developed an instinctive defence mechanism against these parasitic interlopers. They tried to integrate and rehabilitate those who were already amongst them ... they almost succeeded ... but as soon as their back was turned, the Khazars and their Ashkenazi descendants stabbed them in the back. The Khazars, operating from their newly established refuge in New York City, made sure of that, by declaring war against Germany (i.e., the German people) in 1933.

Rabbinical Judaism, as a belief system, is clearly a mental illness. But, even so, the real enemy of mankind are those who carry the Khazar gene: those who were dispersed into Russia and Eastern Europe from their ancient lands in the North Caucasus, by the invading Mongel hordes. Prior to this dispersion, the Khazars had turned the parasitic existence into an art form. Therefore, what we are witnessing in late 20th and early 21st century America, is nothing less than the pre-12th Century AD practises of the uprooted Khazars being played out under the guise of 'Western' institutions.

Anonymous said...

Dear Mr. Hoffman,

You make salient points. However, did not Charles Provan find the existence of holes at Auschwitz -- holes necessary for the induction of poison gas? Indeed, was not Charles Provan a sign of contradiction in the revisionist movement? I'm referring to the following article:


Based on Provan's research (and the reactions to his discovery -- reactions just as volatile as those inspired by Bishop Williamson's remarks), one could claim that revisionism is just as much a religion as the "holocaustianity" it derides.

I don't think the Pope's posturing is intended for the rabbis (who, as the Pope well knows, won't be budged anyway), but rather for the secular crowd (jew or otherwise) who, sadly, are moved more by mawkishness than logic. In like manner, the SSPX excommunications were lifted -- not because Pope Benedict XVI is endorsing the Society's erroneous positions -- but in an attempt to draw as many as close to The Church as possible. One can lament this pastoral strategy all they want, but to suggest that the Pope is working against the Gospel, or, similarly, that he's a "double agent" denies Christ's promise to His Church. It simply isn't a Catholic position. The infallibility and indefectibility of the See of Rome (i.e., the local Church of Rome) is de fide. To suggest otherwise is manifest heresy.

I also don't think Benedict XVI -- or any other "conciliar" Pope -- is attempting to replace Calvary with Auschwitz. That sort of melodrama is overreaching and smacks of a chialism (or millenarianism) that Pius XII said could not be taught reliably and which The Catechism of The Catholic Church formally condemns.

CCC #676 and #677: "The Antichrist's deception already begins to take shape in the world every time the claim is made to realize within history that messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history through the eschatalogical judgement. The Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism, especially the "intrinsically perverse" political form of a secular messianism.

The Church will enter the glory of the kingdom only through the final Passover, when she will follow her Lord in his death and Resurrection. The kingdom will be fulfilled, then, not by a historic triumph of the Church through a progressive ascendancy, but only by God's victory over the final unleashing of evil, which will cause his Bride to come down from heaven. God's triumph over the revolt of evil will take the form of the Last Judgement after the final cosmic upheaval of this passing world."

Michael Hoffman said...

To "Mission Impossible"

Dear Sir or Madam

Thank you for writing. Some of your survey of history is learned and instructive, however I'm not sure why you make the mistake of using the Orwellian Newspeak, "Holocaust." You decry a "Holocaust' myth." This plays into the hands of the enemies of truth, for no one has ever decided on a rational, empiric definition of this "Holocaust." It can mean anything. Do you say it is a "myth" that hundreds of thousands of Judaic people were cruelly extruded from Germany, shot in pits and employed as slave labor in concentration camps? This was not a myth.

The actual myth is the assertion of execution gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau, where the Zionists and the rabbinate have focused their movie cameras and media moxie. Their credibility stands or falls on that fulcrum. Be specific when making your charges. Don't volunteer for their "Holocaust-denier" stereotype; that's a strait-jacket into which they desire to tailor us.

Your comment concludes with a racialist dogma very conducive to the rabbis. It is obvious that you have not read my book on Judaism and do not know that the rabbis prepare Judaic youth to be hated for things they cannot change (like their genetic makeup). The rabbis order them not to leave Judaism because they will never be fully accepted as sincere Christian converts. Your thinking is an enhancement of this deadly rabbinic prevarication.

I assume you are not a Christian. Jesus did not come to save or damn allegedly favored (Darwin) or defective (Hitler) races. He came for all men and women of good will, be they Khazar, Sephardic, Asian, African, Caucasian etc.

Your racial theory is an unconscious promotion of rabbinic teaching and prophecy. I reject it completely.

Michael Hoffman

Michael Hoffman said...

To Anonymous 1:31 a.m.

My late friend and colleague Charles D. Provan was a master of Biblical texts and scriptural insight and a first class archival researcher who dug through World War II archives in the Washington D.C. area like the most industrious of moles. If you watch the interview I did with him on WWII revisionism (on DVD) you will see his theories that Judaics themselves operated the alleged "execution gas chambers" in Treblinka.

However, when it comes to the proposition of execution gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau, Chuck's research and theories were demolished in a debate with Brian Renk at the David Irving revisionist conference in Cincinnati, which I believe occurred on either Labor Day weekend of 2000 or 2001. The debate was videotaped. Perhaps you could inquire of Mr. Irving for a copy. Provan was trounced and he was the most astute of all extermination theorists.

Chuck was a man without guile or ego and I once asked him if he thought he might have some deep psychological need to believe in homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. He laughed for a moment and then gave it some thought. After which, in that inimitable innocence of his, he shrugged his shoulders and said, "I don't know. Maybe."

No one is perfect. Certainly not this writer and alas, Charles D. Provan proved his fallibility in the Auschwitz debate with Mr. Renk.

Michael Hoffman

Mission Impossible said...

Michael, you raise some very valid points, and I thank you for your clarifying and learned response.

Writing on this topic can often feel like one has to tread on eggshells whilst simultaneously negotiating a maze that has its internal walls lined with electrified fencing!

Yes, use of the word 'Holocaust' is strange, as I believe its original and true meaning is 'fire' ... therefore its use would properly suggest the elimination of 'Jewish' persons during WWII by burning, and not by gassing. Another chink in the hoax sculpture?

I accept your clarification on what actually constitutes the fundamental myth surrounding the so-called 'final solution' and specifically, Auschwitz-Birkenau. I am fully aware that many 'Jewish' communities in Eastern Europe were rounded up, and shot, and I am not without sympathy! There is also the issue of mobile gassing vans used during the early phase of the Nazi advance east (you will know the correct technical term for these vans).

Most certainly, what is truly contentious is the failure of historians to agree exactly what methods were used, and when, and where. Just how many did these various methods dispose of? If proper academic enquiry could be allowed (employing investigative experts from different cultures -- an 'International Enquiry' as suggested by Anonymous at 3:27 pm) then we would also be able to properly place those atrocities alongside those committed earlier, upon ethnic Germans by ethnic 'Jews' in and around Bromberg (the Red Cross witnessed the aftermath, of smashed skulls and grotesque de-bowling) and also the systematic humiliation of Germans and German culture during the Weimar Republic (principally by members of Europe's 'Jewish' community who 'flooded' into Germany to take economic advantage), which was a deliberately planned provocation!

I have not yet read your book on Judaism, but I have read many excellent reviews, and do plan to acquire a copy, just as soon as I know I have the time to do your masterly work justice.

As regards the sensibilities of Rabbis, I could not care one jot. I have little respect for the representatives of a narcissistic, aggressive, and highly exclusive belief system that genuflects to a wall; a wall which was probably a Roman Garrison, and NOT the much touted and largely mythical second Temple.

On the question of "my racial theory." Well, I was trying to draw an important distinction between Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jewish mindsets. I do not believe in the melting pot. I am proud of my own distinctive racial (ethnic) heritage, and I expect people of all other races to be the same (as indeed most are already). I have spent many years of my own life living with and happily mixing with peoples not of my own race, and I have no concerns about maintaining racial purity where it can be realistically preserved. In this regard, I do accept that most American born persons find such discussions of racial stereotyping extremely difficult. Remember it was another ex-East European 'Jew' who invented and promoted the lie (whilst abusing his position in American academia) that race was a social construct (ref: Boas).

Suggestion >>> This world is NEVER going to conform to any American born idea regarding race-mixing and cultural dilution. We have observed the deleterious effects of this communistic mindset upon America (it has destroyed you) and we shall therefore happily reject it, if we haven't done so already.

Consequently, I would respectfully suggest that it is extremely valid to continue to argue on the basis of specific genetic characteristics because that is what makes the world beautiful and so interesting. For example, Vietnamese women are not known for flowing blonde hair and a cool & calm disposition as Swedish women are, whilst Swedish women cannot match the demure elegance of the average Vietnamese girl (this is genetic purity amply demonstrated, and as such is surely part of God's plan).

During the past 1,000 years (perhaps longer) racial differences between peoples have initiated far fewer wars and much less bloodshed than the sinister influence of Rabbinical Judaism. Whilst Judaism is essentially a mental illness, Sephardic Jews (and Jews from Ethiopia and Yemen) are not the bloodthirsty operators in this belief system: such a genetic flaw can only be properly attributed to those who descend from the Khazar gene pool. The Khazars were an especially war-like people, and (as you surely know already) once hired themselves out to the highest bidder for many centuries, where they regularly raped and pillaged for kicks and profit. They were even employed by the Byzantines. It stands to reason that those 'Jews' who have been the most problematic to humanity these past 120 years would be descended from East European / Russian Jewry, aka the Ashkenazi ... aka the Khazar ... gene pool; which happens to be a highly mongrelized gene pool due to their 8 centuries of dispersal.

Well, contrary to your assessment, I actually would consider myself a Christian, but not one who follows the faith dogmatically. I do agree with your comment: "Jesus did not come to save or damn allegedly favored (Darwin) or defective (Hitler) races. He came for all men and women of good will, be they Khazar, Sephardic, Asian, African, Caucasian etc."

Nonetheless, I still choose to draw a racial distinction when identifying the Khazars/Ashkenazis as the source of our specific problem(s) --- based upon their genetic dispositions --- because in part I am basing my analysis upon Matthew 7:15-20:

"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits you will know them."

I do respect your balanced and empathetic approach Michael, which I know to be sincere. But, I am not one who believes we should always be 'trimming our sails' to take into account what fascist organizations like the ADL might think or say in response; nor the myriad thousands of other so-called 'Jewish' organizations dotted around the Western World. We should stop being reactive, and start being proactive. Our own culture has been infested with a parasitic sub-culture that is out to kill its host: the stakes are rather too high (I would suggest) to pussy foot; always endeavouring to be ever so polite.

Whilst I most certainly agree we should remain open and welcoming to all those 'Jews' who sincerely wish to convert to Christianity, I nevertheless remain skeptical such conversions will ever get beyond 30% or so. In any case, where I wish to direct my ire is at the hardcore, messianic 'Jews' whose blood-lusts and desire for ultimate control & power, over all of mankind, is well known and attested.

Every race (and their sub races) is defective in some way or other! That is the beauty of being human. If you want to meet someone with a warm heart where would you choose to go in search? Southern England or Ecuador?

The Germans do not have a highly developed sense of humour like the English once had (i.e., until American political correctness killed it off), but that needn't stop anyone from admiring the high culture that the German people brought to the world, not to mention a long list of world firsts in Chemical Engineering and Physics. We should all learn to completely jettison this paranoid 'Jewish' mindset ... and celebrate our racial differences as we once did unabashedly, which will then enable us all to regain possession of our unique identities and cultural histories. This will not bring a return to wars, so long as we first reject the notion that Jews constitute a race and so long as we learn to deal decisively with the real provokers of mass violence: the scourge of International Fractional Bankers headed by that most evil influence; the Rothschild dynasty.

Footnote: for your information, I am a Sir.

Anonymous said...

While all of these comments are thoughtful observations concerning the attack on Bishop Williamson, I, for one, cannot help but marvel at something much greater at work here: the profound love (!) that Our Blessed Lord must have for this English clergyman by inviting him to share in His suffering to this extent. Cardinal Newman, Father Ignatius of St. Paul (eg, George Spencer, brother of Frederick, 4th Earl Spencer), indeed, all the English martyrs, must be weeping with joy in heaven!